Clear search
๐ŸŒ Join Nomads.com free ๐Ÿ‘‹  Log in
General
Nomads.com Frontpage ๐ŸŒ—  Dark mode โค๏ธ  Your favorites ๐Ÿš‘  Nomad insurance
Community
โค๏ธ Dating app ๐Ÿค  Friend finder ๐Ÿ’ฌ  Chat ๐ŸŒŽ  Members map ๐Ÿ’ˆ  Host meetup
new
๐Ÿน  Attend meetup
Tools
๐Ÿœ  Explore ๐ŸŽ’  NomadGPT ๐Ÿค–  MCP server ๐Ÿ“ธ  Vote on photos ๐Ÿ—“  Residence calendar ๐Ÿ’ธ  FIRE calculator ๐ŸŒค  Climate finder ๐Ÿ’ฐ  Best value cities ๐Ÿ   Housing affordability ๐Ÿ’ฅ  Fastest growing ๐Ÿ“Š  Nomad stats
new
๐Ÿงช State of remote work new ๐Ÿ“œ  History of nomads
new
๐Ÿ•ธ  Network graph ๐Ÿ”Œ  Fastest internet ๐Ÿ†  Best place now ๐Ÿ”ฎ  Random place ๐Ÿ”ฎ  Random good place
Help
๐Ÿ’ก  Ideas + bugs ๐Ÿš€  Changelog ๐Ÿ›๏ธ  Merch ๐Ÿ›Ÿ  FAQ & Help ๐Ÿง‘โ€โš–๏ธ  TOS & Privacy policy
Other projects
๐Ÿฉ  Hotelist ๐ŸŒŠ  Ericeira ๐Ÿ›ฐ  Remote jobs โœˆ๏ธ  Airline List ๐Ÿ—บ  Neighborhoods ๐Ÿ’พ  Pieter.com โœˆ๏ธ  fly.pieter.com ๐Ÿ  Coworkations โ˜•๏ธ  Nomad Cafe ๐Ÿก  Interior AI ๐Ÿ“ธ  Photo AI ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ  eu/acc ๐Ÿ“‘  JSON.pub

The 2026 State of Digital Nomads

Explore the world


Who is the average nomad in 2026?

๐Ÿ‘ถ 37-year old

โš– ๏ธ Non-progressive

๐Ÿ’ซ Not religious

๐Ÿ˜Ž Single

โœ‹๐Ÿป White

๐Ÿ‘‹ Heterosexual

๐Ÿ‘จ โ€ Man

๐ŸŽ“ with a
Bachelor's

๐Ÿ’ป works as a
Software Dev

๐Ÿก from
a Home office

๐Ÿ’ฐ makes
$85,000 / y

โ˜•๏ธ loves
Coffee

๐Ÿฅฉ eats meat

๐Ÿฅพ works out by
Hiking

๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต loves
Tokyo most

๐Ÿ’‰ is vaccinated

๐Ÿƒ produces 73% less COโ‚‚

5๏ธโƒฃ and stays for
5 months

n=46,081


Remote work is now on an exponential trajectory and growing fast. With its growth, hundreds of millions of people who are now newly working remotely from home, a cafe, or coworking space, will realize they've become location independent and travel or move to new places. In this report, we try to figure out who these people are, what work do they do, and how they spend their life based on data from tens of thousands of Nomads.com members.

This page is built LIVE with data pulled straight from the database every day, so it's always up-to-date. Conclusions you can derive from this are always limited and merely indicative but possibly interesting. Nomads.com is a paid membership community, which means there's a selection bias as people who do not or cannot pay are not in the dataset. On the other hand, free digital nomad communities, like on Facebook, require no commitment to join, therefore it's not clear if these people are merely aspirational or active nomads or not. On Nomads.com we can confirm they are active based on their travel logs.

The title of this report is inspired by Buffer's amazing annual remote work report (and used with permission).

You can freely use this page's data, as long as you reference us as "Nomads.com" (with space in between) and use our logo and link back on every data mention! Thanks!. If you like this, also see the live network graph of all travels on Nomads.com and the fastest growing remote work hubs of 2026.

Last updated: 24 minutes ago

๐Ÿ‘ถ Nomads by age

Age %
18
0.1%
21
0.1%
22
0.3%
23
0.3%
24
0.5%
25
1%
26
2%
27
2%
28
2%
29
2%
30
2%
31
3%
32
6%
33
7%
34
7%
35
5%
36
6%
37
8%
38
6%
39
5%
40
5%
41
4%
42
4%
43
3%
44
2%
active last 365d, n=1,013

โ›ณ๏ธ Nomads by nationality

# Country People %
1 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 55,862,652 42%
2 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom 9,126,077 7%
3 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 6,107,892 5%
4 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia 5,869,488 4%
5 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany 5,631,085 4%
6 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France 4,710,848 4%
7 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil 3,614,193 3%
8 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia 3,142,155 2%
9 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 2,498,466 2%
10 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain 2,479,394 2%
11 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India 2,474,626 2%
12 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy 2,012,124 2%
13 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Ukraine 1,945,371 1%
14 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland 1,659,287 1%
15 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland 1,354,131 1%
16 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turkey 1,039,438 1%
17 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria 1,015,598 1%
18 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan 958,381 1%
19 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden 934,541 1%
20 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland 915,469 1%
21 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel 839,179 1%
22 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium 820,107 1%
23 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czechia 796,267 1%
24 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea 772,427 1%
25 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Argentina 748,586 1%
26 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portugal 739,050 1%
27 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa 715,210 1%
28 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico 715,210 1%
29 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Romania 696,138 1%
30 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China 667,529 0%
n=28,025

๐Ÿ‘ถ Nomads by gender

Gender %
๐Ÿ‘จโ€ Men
82%
๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ Women
18%
๐Ÿง‘ Other
0%
active last 365d, n=14,554

๐Ÿ‘€ Nomads by sexuality

Sexuality %
๐Ÿ‘‹ Heterosexual
88%
๐Ÿฆ„ Bisexual
7%
๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ Gay or lesbian
5%
n=17,904

๐Ÿ™ Nomads by beliefs

Religion %
๐Ÿ’ซ Not religious
51%
๐Ÿ™ Spirituality
28%
โ›ช๏ธ Christianity
11%
๐Ÿ™ Buddhism
3%
๐Ÿ•Œ Islam
3%
โœจ Astrology
2%
๐Ÿ• Judaism
2%
๐Ÿ•‰ Hinduism
1%
๐Ÿ‘ณ Sikhism
0%
n=9,342

โœ‹ Nomads by ethnicity

Ethnicity %
โœ‹๐Ÿป White
59%
โœ‹๐Ÿพ Non-white
41%
โœ‹๐Ÿผ Asian
14%
โœ‹๐Ÿฝ Latin
12%
โœ‹๐Ÿฟ Black
7%
โœ‹๐Ÿฝ Indian
5%
โœ‹๐Ÿพ Middle Eastern
3%
โœ‹๐Ÿฝ Pacific
1%
n=8,495

๐ŸŽ“ Education

Education %
๐ŸšŒ High School
9%
๐ŸŽ“ Higher education
91%
๐Ÿ“œ Bachelor's
53%
๐ŸŽ“ Master's
34%
๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿซ PhD
3%
n=19,715

โค๏ธ Nomads by relationship

Relationship %
๐Ÿ˜Ž Single
67%
๐Ÿ˜ In a relationship
33%
n=11,361

๐Ÿ‘€ Nomads looking for

Looking for %
๐Ÿค Friends
36%
๐ŸŽ’ Travel buddies
32%
๐Ÿน Casual dating
15%
โค๏ธ Relationship
13%
๐Ÿ‘ Poly dating
4%
n=66,393

๐Ÿ’ฐ Nomads by income

Income %
< $25k / y
7%
$25k - $50k / y
15%
$50k - $100k / y
33%
$100k - $250k / y
35%
> $250k - $1M / y
9%
> $1M / y
2%
Average $125,206 / y
Median $85,000 / y
n=5,845

๐Ÿ’ฐ Nomads by employment

Employment type %
Full time
37%
Freelance
19%
Startup founder
19%
Full time contractor
9%
Agency
8%
Other
6%
Part time
2%
Part time contractor
1%
n=7,547


๐Ÿก Where do nomads work from

Place %
๐Ÿก Home office
58%
๐Ÿฌ Coworking
15%
โ˜•๏ธ Cafe
8%
๐Ÿข Office
8%
๐Ÿ›‹ Couch
3%
๐Ÿฝ Dining table
3%
๐Ÿ› Bed
2%
๐Ÿช‘ Balcony
1%
๐Ÿš Van
1%
๐Ÿ”ช Kitchen
0%
๐Ÿชด Garden
0%
๐Ÿ›ฅ Boat
0%
๐Ÿ’ฆ Pool
0%
๐Ÿ“š Library
0%
n=6,332

๐Ÿ’ฌ What messaging apps nomads use?

Messaging app %
Telegram
50%
Whatsapp
43%
Snapchat
3%
Facebook
2%
WeChat
0%
LINE
0%
Slack
0%
n=6,228


โš–๏ธ Nomad men by politics

Politics %
๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ Progressive
44%
โš–๏ธ Non-progressive
56%
๐Ÿ—ฝ Libertarian
27%
โš–๏ธ Centrist
21%
๐Ÿ‘ด Conservative
8%
n=3,897

โš–๏ธ Nomad women by politics

Politics %
๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ Progressive
72%
โš–๏ธ Non-progressive
28%
๐Ÿ—ฝ Libertarian
12%
โš–๏ธ Centrist
12%
๐Ÿ‘ด Conservative
3%
n=889


What do nomads eat?

๐Ÿฅฉ 77% of ๐Ÿ‘จโ€ men eat meat

๐Ÿฅฉ 57% of ๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธwomen eat meat

๐Ÿšซ 37% of nomads don't eat meat

๐Ÿฅ’ 11% are vegetarian

๐Ÿฅ‘ 11% are vegan

๐ŸŸ 5% are pescetarian

n=8,380


๐Ÿ• Nomad men by diet

Diet %
๐Ÿฅฉ Eats meat
77%
๐Ÿšซ Does not eat meat
23%
๐Ÿฅ’ Vegetarian
10%
๐Ÿฅ‘ Vegan
10%
๐ŸŸ Pescetarian
4%
n=6,031

๐Ÿ• Nomad women by diet

Diet %
๐Ÿฅฉ Eats meat
57%
๐Ÿšซ Does not eat meat
43%
๐Ÿฅ’ Vegetarian
19%
๐Ÿฅ‘ Vegan
15%
๐ŸŸ Pescetarian
10%
n=1,276


How do nomads work out?

๐Ÿฅพ Hiking

๐Ÿ’ช Fitness

๐Ÿƒ Running

๐Ÿคธโ€โ™€๏ธ Yoga

๐ŸŠ Swimming

๐Ÿšด Cycling

n=16,588


๐Ÿ˜… Nomad men by sports

Sport %
๐Ÿ’ช Fitness
49%
๐Ÿฅพ Hiking
47%
๐Ÿƒ Running
28%
๐Ÿšด Cycling
24%
๐ŸŠ Swimming
23%
๐Ÿคธโ€โ™€๏ธ Yoga
20%
๐Ÿ„ Surfing
18%
๐ŸŒŠ Diving
15%
๐Ÿ‚ Snowboarding
15%
โ›ท Skiing
15%
โ›ฐ Climbing
15%
๐ŸŽพ Tennis
14%
๐Ÿ Motorcycling
13%
๐Ÿ’ช Fight sports
10%
๐Ÿ“ Table tennis
9%
n=11,714

๐Ÿ˜… Nomad women by sports

Sport %
๐Ÿฅพ Hiking
51%
๐Ÿคธโ€โ™€๏ธ Yoga
45%
๐Ÿ’ช Fitness
40%
๐ŸŠ Swimming
25%
๐Ÿƒ Running
21%
๐Ÿšด Cycling
17%
๐ŸŒŠ Diving
15%
๐Ÿ„ Surfing
14%
โ›ฐ Climbing
13%
โ›ท Skiing
12%
๐ŸŽพ Tennis
11%
๐Ÿ‚ Snowboarding
9%
๐Ÿ’ช Crossfit
5%
๐Ÿ Motorcycling
5%
๐Ÿ Volleyball
5%
n=2,682


Where do nomads like to go most?

๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Tokyo

๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Ericeira

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Chicago

๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portimรฃo

๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Varna

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Reykjavik

n=429,586


๐Ÿ˜ Most liked cities by men

# City Rating
1 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Kuala Lumpur 4.55
2 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Tokyo 4.38
3 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Chiang Mai 4.29
4 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 4.17
5 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico City 4.17
6 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Osaka 4.17
7 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Madrid 4.17
8 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Prague 4.17
9 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Amsterdam 4.17
10 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Bangkok 4.12
11 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Krakรณw 4.00
12 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ New York City 4.00
13 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Ubud 4.00
14 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Fukuoka 4.00
15 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Dubai 4.00
n=6,779

๐Ÿ˜ Most liked cities by women

# City Rating
1 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Medellรญn 3.75
2 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Bangkok 3.33
3 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Chiang Mai 3.33
4 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Da Nang 3.33
5 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Azores 3.33
6 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Tbilisi 3.33
7 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico City 3.33
8 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Valencia 3.33
9 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Antigua 3.33
10 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Sydney 3.33
11 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Buenos Aires 3.33
12 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ The Hague 3.33
13 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Stockholm 3.33
14 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bansko 3.33
15 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Hue 3.33
n=6,779


Most visited countries, on the map

1 trip 57,014 trips (log scale)


๐ŸŒ† Most visited cities

# City % visited
1 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Bangkok 2.22%
2 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง London 2.19%
3 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Barcelona 1.48%
4 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Paris 1.46%
5 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ New York City 1.46%
6 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Lisbon 1.43%
7 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Berlin 1.43%
8 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Amsterdam 1.18%
9 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ San Francisco 1.13%
10 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Chiang Mai 1.07%
11 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico City 0.98%
12 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Tokyo 0.93%
13 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Canggu 0.91%
14 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 0.89%
15 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Istanbul 0.86%
16 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Madrid 0.83%
17 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Kuala Lumpur 0.81%
18 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Los Angeles 0.8%
19 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Dubai 0.79%
20 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Budapest 0.77%
21 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Prague 0.71%
22 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Buenos Aires 0.69%
23 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Medellรญn 0.62%
24 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Rome 0.6%
25 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Moscow 0.59%
26 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Vienna 0.57%
27 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท Seoul 0.56%
28 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Ho Chi Minh City 0.55%
29 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong 0.54%
30 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Phuket 0.53%
n=429,586

๐ŸŒŽ Most visited countries

# Country % visited
1 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 13%
2 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Thailand 5%
3 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain 5%
4 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany 4%
5 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom 4%
6 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico 3%
7 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France 3%
8 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy 3%
9 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portugal 3%
10 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia 2%
11 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan 2%
12 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil 2%
13 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 2%
14 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 2%
15 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Vietnam 2%
16 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turkey 2%
17 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia 1%
18 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland 1%
19 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Colombia 1%
20 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia 1%
21 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia 1%
22 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India 1%
23 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Greece 1%
24 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Argentina 1%
25 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland 1%
26 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China 1%
27 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria 1%
28 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates 1%
29 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 1%
30 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia 1%
n=429,586

๐Ÿƒ Avg. COโ‚‚ by member traveling

Year COโ‚‚
2013
674 kg/y
2014
985 kg/y
2015
1,075 kg/y
2016
1,285 kg/y
2017
1,462 kg/y
2018
1,537 kg/y
2019
1,569 kg/y
2020
990 kg/y
2021
1,002 kg/y
2022
1,570 kg/y
2023
1,721 kg/y
2024
1,696 kg/y
2025
1,598 kg/y
2026
1,639 kg/y
Average 1,307 kg/y
Median 1,373 kg/y
Based on 429,586 trips by 16,323 members @ 115g/km COโ‚‚ emitted.
An average American spends ~5,000kg/y on commuting by car and flying. We'd assume nomads travel more internationally but on the other hand they don't commute to work since they work 100% remotely. Many walk to work or work from their home, hotel or Airbnb. That means on average nomads generate 1,373 kg/y, or 73% less COโ‚‚ than the average American on travel and commuting.


๐Ÿ‘จ Where men go most

# Tag vs. ๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ
1 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Bangkok +25%
2 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Lisbon -16%
3 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Barcelona -10%
4 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง London -22%
5 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Chiang Mai -2%
6 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Paris -23%
7 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Amsterdam +1%
8 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Berlin -3%
9 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Canggu +4%
10 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Tokyo +15%
11 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Istanbul +7%
12 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore +13%
13 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Kuala Lumpur +28%
14 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico City -20%
15 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Budapest +16%
median temp=18°C; n=429,586

๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ Where women go most

# Tag vs. ๐Ÿ‘จ
1 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Lisbon +19%
2 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง London +28%
3 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Bangkok -20%
4 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Paris +30%
5 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Barcelona +11%
6 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Chiang Mai +2%
7 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico City +26%
8 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Berlin +3%
9 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Amsterdam -1%
10 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Rome +27%
11 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Canggu -4%
12 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Istanbul -6%
13 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Ubud +31%
14 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Tokyo -13%
15 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore -11%
median temp=18°C; n=429,586


๐Ÿ‘จ Where men go more

# Tag vs. women
1 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia +78%
2 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland +64%
3 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Georgia +50%
4 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Romania +47%
5 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Philippines +36%
6 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong +31%
7 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia +28%
8 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช United Arab Emirates +28%
9 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China +26%
10 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czechia +21%
11 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan +21%
12 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Vietnam +19%
13 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway +18%
14 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia +17%
15 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary +16%
median temp=13°C; n=429,586

๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ Where women go more

# Tag vs. men
1 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Costa Rica +52%
2 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa +49%
3 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico +38%
4 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom +31%
5 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia +29%
6 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France +23%
7 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy +21%
8 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Chile +19%
9 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Greece +14%
10 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia +13%
11 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portugal +12%
12 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช Peru +10%
13 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland +9%
14 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain +7%
15 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Argentina +7%
median temp=18°C; n=429,586


๐Ÿ˜ Most liked countries

# Country Rating
1 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan 4.85
2 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary 4.65
3 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czechia 4.55
4 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia 4.55
5 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Latvia 4.5
6 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland 4.45
7 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea 4.4
8 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland 4.4
9 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Guatemala 4.3
10 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Kazakhstan 4.3
11 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa 4.25
12 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Estonia 4.25
13 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania 4.25
14 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia 4.25
15 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Greece 4.2
n=4,015

๐Ÿคฎ Least liked countries

# Country Rating
1 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡บ Cuba 1
2 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท Iran 1.65
3 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Gibraltar 1.65
4 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ณ Honduras 1.65
5 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Cyprus 1.65
6 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Moldova 2
7 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡น Malta 2.15
8 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Chile 2.25
9 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Sri Lanka 2.35
10 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด Somalia 2.5
11 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡น Ethiopia 2.5
12 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฟ Tanzania 2.5
13 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ณ Senegal 2.5
14 ๐Ÿด Kurdistan 2.5
15 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Cameroon 2.5
n=4,015


โฐ How long do nomads stay in one city?

Duration %
< 7 days
47%
7 - 30 days
33%
30 - 90 days
14%
90+ days
6%
Average 63 days (2 months)
Median 7 days
n=418,623

๐Ÿก How long do nomads stay in one country?

Duration %
< 7 days
0%
7 - 30 days
59%
30 - 90 days
28%
90+ days
14%
Average 158 days (5 months)
n=418,623





What do nomads do for work?

๐Ÿ’ป Software Dev

๐Ÿ“‡ Startup Founder

๐Ÿ•ธ Web Dev

๐Ÿ˜ Marketing

๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐ŸŽจ Creative

๐Ÿ“Š SaaS

n=32,747


๐Ÿ‘จ Nomad men work as

# Work % vs. women
1 ๐Ÿ’ป Software Dev 31% +283%
2 ๐Ÿ“‡ Startup Founder 25% +131%
3 ๐Ÿ•ธ Web Dev 25% +279%
4 ๐Ÿ˜ Marketing 14% -11%
5 ๐Ÿ“Š SaaS 12% +183%
6 ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐ŸŽจ Creative 11% -28%
7 ๐Ÿ“ฑ Mobile Dev 10% +348%
8 ๐ŸŽจ UI/UX Design 10% +22%
9 ๐Ÿค  Product Manager 10% +55%
10 ๐Ÿ“ˆ Data 9% +79%
11 ๐Ÿ’ฐ Crypto 9% +266%
12 ๐Ÿ’ฐ Finance 9% +109%
13 ๐Ÿ›’ Ecommerce 8% +86%
14 ๐Ÿค‘ Sales 7% +68%
15 ๐Ÿ—ƒ Dev Ops 6% +435%
n=26,108

๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ Nomad women work as

# Work % vs. men
1 ๐Ÿ˜ Marketing 15% +12%
2 ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐ŸŽจ Creative 15% +40%
3 ๐Ÿ“‡ Startup Founder 11% -57%
4 ๐Ÿ’ป Software Dev 8% -74%
5 ๐ŸŽจ UI/UX Design 8% -18%
6 ๐Ÿค Community 8% +49%
7 ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿซ Education 7% +35%
8 ๐Ÿ“ Blogging 7% +41%
9 ๐Ÿ‘Š Coach 7% +45%
10 ๐Ÿ•ธ Web Dev 7% -74%
11 ๐Ÿค  Product Manager 6% -36%
12 ๐Ÿ“ˆ Data 5% -44%
13 ๐Ÿ“Š SaaS 4% -65%
14 ๐Ÿ’ฐ Finance 4% -52%
15 ๐Ÿ›’ Ecommerce 4% -46%
n=6,742


๐Ÿ‘จ Nomad men vs. women

# Tag vs. women
1 ๐Ÿ—ƒ Dev Ops +435%
2 ๐Ÿ“ก Sysadmin +391%
3 ๐Ÿ— Engineering +385%
4 ๐Ÿ“ฑ Mobile Dev +348%
5 ๐Ÿ“ˆ Investor +344%
6 ๐Ÿ‘พ Game Dev +324%
7 ๐Ÿช– Military +313%
8 ๐Ÿค– AI +309%
9 ๐Ÿ’ป Software Dev +283%
10 ๐Ÿ•ธ Web Dev +279%
11 ๐Ÿ’ฐ Crypto +266%
12 ๐Ÿค– AI model +227%
13 ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ InfoSec +222%
14 ๐Ÿ“Š SaaS +183%
15 ๐Ÿ˜Ž VR Dev +151%
n=32,747

๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ Nomad women vs. men

# Tag vs. men
1 ๐Ÿ‘ธ House wife +132%
2 ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ Human resources +105%
3 ๐Ÿ‘— Tradwife +94%
4 ๐Ÿ“ฐ Journalism +80%
5 ๐Ÿง  Psychologist +79%
6 ๐Ÿ™‚ Support +63%
7 ๐Ÿ‘‹ Hospitality +57%
8 ๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš•๏ธ Medical +49%
9 ๐Ÿค Community +49%
10 ๐Ÿ‘Š Coach +45%
11 ๐Ÿฅ Healthcare +44%
12 ๐Ÿ“ Blogging +41%
13 ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐ŸŽจ Creative +40%
14 ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿซ Education +35%
15 ๐Ÿ“ž Recruitment +34%
n=32,747


How do nomads describe themselves?

โ˜•๏ธ Coffee

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Speaks English

๐Ÿ™‚ Optimist

โ›ฐ Outdoors

๐Ÿ’ช Fitness

๐Ÿฅพ Hiking

n=32,747


๐Ÿ‘จโ€ Nomad men

# Tag % vs. ๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ
1 โ˜•๏ธ Coffee 33% +15%
2 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Speaks English 29% +11%
3 ๐Ÿ™‚ Optimist 28% +18%
4 ๐Ÿ’ช Fitness 23% +37%
5 ๐Ÿ˜Ž Single 22% +21%
6 โ›ฐ Outdoors 22% -5%
7 ๐Ÿฅพ Hiking 22% +3%
8 ๐Ÿ’‰ COVID vaccinated 22% +10%
9 ๐Ÿง  Open-minded 22% +12%
10 ๐Ÿถ Dogs 21% -5%
11 โ˜€๏ธ Waking up early 21% +14%
12 ๐Ÿบ Beer 20% +110%
13 ๐ŸŒ™ Staying up late 20% +42%
14 ๐Ÿ“– Reading 20% -4%
15 ๐Ÿšญ No smoking 19% +12%
n=26,108

๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ Nomad women

# Tag % vs. ๐Ÿ‘จโ€
1 โ˜•๏ธ Coffee 29% -13%
2 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Speaks English 26% -10%
3 ๐Ÿ™‚ Optimist 23% -15%
4 โ›ฐ Outdoors 23% +6%
5 ๐Ÿถ Dogs 22% +5%
6 ๐Ÿฅพ Hiking 21% -3%
7 ๐Ÿท Wine 21% +11%
8 ๐Ÿ“– Reading 21% +4%
9 ๐Ÿ’‰ COVID vaccinated 20% -9%
10 ๐Ÿต Tea 20% +13%
11 ๐Ÿง  Open-minded 19% -11%
12 ๐Ÿคธโ€โ™€๏ธ Yoga 19% +103%
13 ๐Ÿ˜Ž Single 19% -17%
14 โ˜€๏ธ Waking up early 18% -12%
15 ๐Ÿ’ช Fitness 17% -27%
n=6,742


๐Ÿ‘จ Nomad men vs. women

# Tag vs. ๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ
1 ๐Ÿ‘จ No beard +546%
2 โšฝ๏ธ Football +367%
3 ๐Ÿง‘โ€ Short hair +338%
4 ๐Ÿช‚ Dropout +255%
5 โœˆ๏ธ Private pilot +242%
6 ๐Ÿ€ Basketball +232%
7 ๐Ÿ’ Ice hockey +228%
8 ๐ŸŽ Race sports +195%
9 ๐Ÿ“ Table tennis +191%
10 โ™Ÿ๏ธ Chess +191%
11 ๐Ÿ Motorcycling +189%
12 ๐Ÿ•‰ Hindu +188%
13 ๐Ÿ‘ด Conservative politics +186%
14 ๐Ÿ’ช Fight sports +177%
15 ๐ŸŽง Hardstyle music +150%
n=32,747

๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ Nomad women vs. men

# Tag vs. ๐Ÿ‘จ
1 ๐Ÿ’„ Makeup +3,988%
2 ๐Ÿคธโ€โ™€๏ธ Pilates +1,039%
3 ๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ Long hair +385%
4 ๐Ÿถ Ceramics +384%
5 โšฑ๏ธ Luxury brands +287%
6 ๐Ÿ‘— Dress up +277%
7 โœจ Astrology +271%
8 ๐Ÿ’ช Feminism +249%
9 ๐Ÿถ Pottery +210%
10 โœจ Believe in astrology +182%
11 ๐ŸŸฅ Red hair +166%
12 ๐Ÿ’Ž Jewelry +158%
13 ๐Ÿ’ƒ Fashion +142%
14 ๐ŸŽจ Drawing +139%
15 ๐Ÿฆพ Disabled +136%
n=32,747




๐Ÿ’‰ Nomads by vaccination

Vaccinated %
๐Ÿ’‰ COVID vaccinated
92%
๐Ÿ’‰ Not COVID vaccinated
8%
n=8,490

๐Ÿ’‰ Vaccination (men)

Vaccinated%
๐Ÿ’‰ Vaccinated
92%
๐Ÿ’‰ Not vaccinated
8%
n=6,231

๐Ÿ’‰ Vaccination (women)

Vaccinated%
๐Ÿ’‰ Vaccinated
93%
๐Ÿ’‰ Not vaccinated
7%
n=1,446

โค๏ธ Nomads by family

Relationship %
โค๏ธ Close to parents
82%
๐Ÿ’” Not close to parents
18%
n=2,641

๐Ÿ‘ถ Nomads by childhood

Childhood %
๐Ÿ˜Š Happy childhood
89%
๐Ÿ˜” Unhappy childhood
11%
n=2,851

๐Ÿ‘จ Childhood (men)

Childhood%
๐Ÿ˜Š Happy childhood
90%
๐Ÿ˜” Unhappy childhood
10%
n=2,172

๐Ÿ‘ฉ Childhood (women)

Childhood%
๐Ÿ˜Š Happy childhood
87%
๐Ÿ˜” Unhappy childhood
13%
n=415

๐Ÿก Homeownership amongst nomads

Homeownership %
๐Ÿก Homeowner
55%
๐Ÿก Not a homeowner
45%
n=3,074


What are the traits of attractive nomads?

Attractiveness is based on the proportion of people liking or disliking a person based on their photo on Nomads.com's dating app. It does not show any of these traits in their profile when they rate them. People who are rated as attractive based on their photo are more likely to have these traits. TL;DR hot people have specific traits, but those specific traits don't necessarily make you hot (you could always try though).

๐Ÿ˜ In a relationship

๐Ÿงฌ Longevity

๐Ÿ’” My parents separated

๐Ÿ Volleyball

๐Ÿง’ Only child

n=32,747


๐Ÿ‘จโ€ Most attractive men's traits

# Tag Diff
1 ๐Ÿงฌ Longevity +277%
2 ๐Ÿš Creatine +215%
3 ๐Ÿ’ฆ Sparkling water +165%
4 ๐Ÿข Slowmad +136%
5 ๐Ÿ˜ In a relationship +135%
6 ๐Ÿธ Padel +128%
7 ๐Ÿ’ฆ Still water +118%
8 ๐ŸŽค Podcast +103%
9 ๐ŸŽฒ Board games +92%
10 ๐Ÿ๏ธ Live near the beach +87%
11 ๐Ÿ€ Basketball +80%
12 โœจ Believe in astrology +77%
13 ๐Ÿฅš Soft boiled eggs +75%
14 โ›ณ๏ธ Golf +69%
15 ๐ŸŽง Dubstep music +68%
16 ๐Ÿก Homeowner +67%
17 ๐Ÿ’‰ Not COVID vaccinated +65%
18 ๐ŸŽง Hiphop music +64%
19 ๐Ÿ’ฌ ๐• +63%
20 โค๏ธ Happy childhood +58%
21 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Reggae music +57%
22 ๐ŸŽ Kitesurfing +56%
23 ๐Ÿ‘ถ Middle child +56%
24 ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€ Weightlifting +56%
25 ๐ŸŒŠ Free diving +55%
26 ๐Ÿก Not a homeowner +55%
27 ๐Ÿ‘ถ Parent +54%
28 ๐Ÿ˜ Extrovert +54%
29 ๐Ÿง‘โ€ Short hair +54%
30 ๐ŸŽง House music +53%
n=32,747

๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ Most attractive women's traits

# Tag Diff
1 ๐Ÿฉ Samoyeds +229%
2 ๐Ÿ’” My parents separated +226%
3 ๐Ÿง’ Only child +225%
4 ๐Ÿ Volleyball +206%
5 ๐ŸŽพ Tennis +201%
6 ๐Ÿ› Shopping +192%
7 ๐Ÿšฌ Social smoker +192%
8 ๐Ÿ“ Table tennis +182%
9 ๐Ÿƒ Running +172%
10 ๐ŸŽง Trance music +170%
11 ๐Ÿ˜ In a relationship +165%
12 ๐Ÿงผ Clean freak +165%
13 ๐Ÿ„ Surfing +150%
14 โ›ท Skiing +147%
15 ๐Ÿ—ฝ Libertarian politics +147%
16 ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐ŸŽค Partying +144%
17 โฌœ๏ธ Has no tattoos +137%
18 ๐ŸŸ Pescetarian +134%
19 ๐Ÿšด Cycling +123%
20 ๐Ÿฅ‘ Vegan +118%
21 ๐Ÿ Motorcycling +116%
22 ๐Ÿฅš Hard boiled eggs +116%
23 ๐ŸŽ’ Backpacking +115%
24 ๐Ÿบ Beer +113%
25 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Chinese food +112%
26 ๐Ÿ 420 +112%
27 ๐Ÿš Vanlife +110%
28 ๐ŸŒ™ Staying up late +109%
29 ๐ŸŒŠ Diving +105%
30 ๐Ÿ’ซ Not religious +105%
n=32,747


And unattractive traits?

Attractiveness is based on the proportion of people liking or disliking a person based on their photo on Nomads.com's dating app. That does NOT mean people like or dislike specific traits. It's that people who are rated as unattractive are more likely to have selected these traits on their profile. TL;DR unattractive people have specific traits, but those specific traits don't necessarily make you unattractive.

๐Ÿ˜ˆ FetLife

๐Ÿ’„ Makeup

๐Ÿ’ƒ Fashion

โšฑ๏ธ Luxury brands

๐Ÿช‚ Skydiving

๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท K-pop music

n=32,747


๐Ÿ‘จโ€ Most unattractive men's traits

# Tag Diff
1 ๐Ÿ˜ˆ FetLife -2,594%
2 ๐Ÿ’„ Makeup -555%
3 ๐Ÿช‚ Skydiving -245%
4 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท K-pop music -195%
5 โšฑ๏ธ Luxury brands -155%
6 ๐Ÿ„ Bodyboarding -86%
7 ๐ŸŽง Garage music -84%
8 ๐Ÿ˜ถโ€๐ŸŒซ๏ธ Hang gliding -78%
9 ๐ŸŽณ Bowling -78%
10 ๐ŸŽญ Swinging -71%
11 ๐Ÿช‚ Paragliding -43%
12 ๐ŸŽง Trance music -33%
13 ๐Ÿ Cricket -32%
14 ๐Ÿฉ Samoyeds -25%
15 ๐Ÿ˜Ž Single -24%
16 ๐Ÿ Motorcycling -21%
17 ๐Ÿš Urbex -21%
18 ๐Ÿ‘… Sex positive -20%
19 ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿฆฒ Bald -17%
20 ๐Ÿ’ƒ Fashion -13%
21 ๐Ÿ‘จ No beard -11%
22 ๐ŸŒป Gardening -11%
23 ๐Ÿ˜ˆ Kink -10%
24 ๐Ÿ– Paleo -8%
25 ๐Ÿ› Shopping -8%
26 ๐Ÿ“” Religious -7%
27 โœˆ๏ธ Private pilot -7%
28 ๐ŸŽ Race sports -6%
29 โ›”๏ธ Doesn't want kids -6%
30 ๐Ÿ’ƒ Dancing -5%
n=32,747

๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ Most unattractive women's traits

# Tag Diff
1 ๐Ÿ’ฅ Messy -2,164%
2 ๐ŸŒธ Anime -1,373%
3 ๐Ÿข Slowmad -1,046%
4 ๐Ÿง Pessimist -991%
5 ๐Ÿšฌ Daily smoker -991%
6 ๐Ÿ๏ธ Live near the beach -909%
7 ๐Ÿ’ฆ Still water -909%
8 ๐Ÿง— Bouldering -882%
9 ๐Ÿงฌ Longevity -718%
10 ๐Ÿ‘ด Conservative politics -636%
11 ๐ŸŽค Podcast -527%
12 ๐Ÿ’ฆ Sparkling water -500%
13 ๐Ÿ’ƒ Fashion -445%
14 ๐Ÿ’ฌ Snapchat -418%
15 ๐Ÿ’… Nails -391%
16 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ท Reggaeton music -336%
17 ๐Ÿš Creatine -309%
18 ๐Ÿ— Vintage -309%
19 ๐Ÿ’ฌ TikTok -309%
20 ๐Ÿ˜ˆ FetLife -255%
21 ๐Ÿ”๏ธ Live in the mountains -227%
22 ๐Ÿถ Pottery -227%
23 ๐Ÿงถ Knitting -145%
24 ๐Ÿ“ Pickleball -145%
25 ๐Ÿ‘  High heels -145%
26 โœจ Believe in astrology -126%
27 ๐Ÿ’Ž Jewelry -118%
28 โค๏ธ Happy childhood -94%
29 ๐Ÿ€ Basketball -91%
30 ๐Ÿ‘ Field hockey -91%
n=32,747


What are the jobs of attractive nomads?

Attractiveness is based on the proportion of people liking or disliking a person based on their photo on Nomads.com's dating app. That does NOT mean people like or dislike specific jobs. It's that people who are rated as attractive are more likely to work in speciifc industries. TL;DR hot people work in specific industries, but those specific industries don't necessarily make you hot (you could always try though).

๐Ÿ“ฑ Mobile Dev

๐Ÿ“ž Recruitment

๐ŸŽจ Artist

๐Ÿค Community

๐Ÿ“Š SaaS

๐ŸŽจ UI/UX Design

n=32,747


๐Ÿ‘จโ€ Attractive men's jobs

# Tag Diff
1 ๐ŸŽจ Artist +171%
2 ๐Ÿค Consulting +93%
3 ๐ŸŽต Music +92%
4 ๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš•๏ธ Medical +82%
5 ๐Ÿ“น Content Creator +75%
6 ๐Ÿค– AI model +69%
7 ๐Ÿ“ธ Model +68%
8 ๐Ÿ“Š SaaS +65%
9 ๐ŸŽจ UI/UX Design +61%
10 ๐Ÿ“ž Recruitment +58%
11 ๐Ÿ— Engineering +55%
12 ๐Ÿง  Psychologist +48%
13 ๐Ÿ‘Š Coach +46%
14 ๐Ÿค  Product Manager +46%
15 ๐Ÿšš Logistics +45%
16 ๐Ÿ›’ Ecommerce +43%
17 ๐Ÿ“ฑ Mobile Dev +38%
18 ๐Ÿ˜ Marketing +38%
19 ๐Ÿค‘ Sales +36%
20 ๐Ÿ’ช Fitness +33%
21 ๐Ÿ“‡ Startup Founder +32%
22 ๐Ÿ˜Ž VR Dev +32%
23 ๐Ÿ—ƒ Dev Ops +31%
24 ๐Ÿ“ˆ Data +30%
25 ๐Ÿ’ป Software Dev +29%
26 ๐Ÿ‘พ Game Dev +23%
27 ๐Ÿ•ธ Web Dev +21%
28 ๐Ÿค Community +20%
29 ๐Ÿƒ Sports +19%
30 ๐Ÿ“ Blogging +18%
n=32,747

๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ Attractive women's jobs

# Tag Diff
1 ๐Ÿ“ฑ Mobile Dev +168%
2 ๐Ÿ“ž Recruitment +125%
3 ๐Ÿค Community +114%
4 ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐ŸŽจ Creative +84%
5 ๐Ÿ’ช Fitness +79%
6 ๐Ÿ’ป Software Dev +74%
7 ๐Ÿ‘Š Coach +69%
8 ๐Ÿ“‡ Startup Founder +69%
9 ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿซ Education +66%
10 ๐Ÿ“ฐ Journalism +59%
11 ๐Ÿ“ Blogging +58%
12 ๐ŸŽจ UI/UX Design +58%
13 ๐Ÿ“Š SaaS +57%
14 ๐Ÿ˜ Marketing +43%
15 ๐Ÿ›’ Ecommerce +39%
16 ๐Ÿ•ธ Web Dev +39%
17 ๐Ÿค  Product Manager +36%
18 ๐Ÿ’ฐ Finance +7%
n=32,747


And most unattractive jobs?

Attractiveness is based on the proportion of people liking or disliking a person based on their photo on Nomads.com's dating app. That does NOT mean people like or dislike specific jobs. It's that people who are rated as unattractive are more likely to have selected these jobs on their profile. TL;DR unattractive people have specific jobs, but those specific jobs don't necessarily make you unattractive.

๐Ÿšฉ Politics

๐Ÿ‘จ Stay-at-home dad

๐Ÿช– Military

๐Ÿ  Real estate

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ InfoSec

๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ’ผ Law

n=32,747


๐Ÿ‘จโ€ Most unattractive men's jobs

# Tag Diff
1 ๐Ÿ‘จ Stay-at-home dad -555%
2 ๐Ÿช– Military -482%
3 ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ’ผ Law -99%
4 ๐Ÿšฉ Politics -80%
5 ๐Ÿ“ฐ Journalism -48%
6 ๐Ÿก Architecture -38%
7 ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ InfoSec -21%
8 ๐Ÿ  Real estate -15%
9 โœˆ๏ธ Aviation -9%
10 ๐ŸŒถ Adult -6%
11 ๐Ÿ—บ Geo -5%
12 ๐Ÿ™‚ Support -2%
n=32,747

๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ Most unattractive women's jobs

# Tag Diff
1 ๐Ÿšฉ Politics -1,373%
2 ๐Ÿ“น Content Creator -1,291%
3 ๐ŸŽจ Artist -691%
4 ๐Ÿ˜Ž VR Dev -636%
5 ๐Ÿฅ Healthcare -500%
6 ๐Ÿ  Real estate -364%
7 ๐Ÿ“ˆ Investor -309%
8 ๐ŸŽต Music -309%
9 ๐Ÿค– AI model -309%
10 ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ InfoSec -200%
11 ๐Ÿ’ผ Retired -173%
12 ๐Ÿ‘‹ Hospitality -148%
13 ๐Ÿ™‚ Support -36%
14 ๐Ÿ“ˆ Data -32%
15 ๐Ÿƒ Sports -30%
16 ๐Ÿค‘ Sales -20%
17 ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ’ผ Law -20%
18 ๐Ÿ’ฐ Crypto -12%
19 ๐Ÿ—บ Geo -6%
n=32,747


Where do attractive people go?

๐Ÿ‘จโ€ Where attractive men travel to

# City Attractiveness
1 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Mykonos 5
2 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Malmรถ 4.67
3 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Uluwatu 4.65
4 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Christchurch 4.64
5 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Ericeira 4.56
6 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Ibiza 4.55
7 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Tamarindo 4.55
8 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Utrecht 4.49
9 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Fuerteventura 4.49
10 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Bergen 4.48
11 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Zadar 4.46
12 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Boston 4.45
13 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Brisbane 4.45
14 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portimรฃo 4.41
15 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Mallorca 4.41
16 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Sarajevo 4.41
17 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Salzburg 4.39
18 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Honolulu 4.37
19 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Reykjavik 4.37
20 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Queenstown 4.35
21 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Cabo San Lucas 4.34
22 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Melbourne 4.34
23 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Oslo 4.33
24 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Catania 4.32
25 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Santorini 4.31
26 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Marrakesh 4.31
27 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Tenerife 4.31
28 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Auckland 4.31
29 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Zurich 4.31
30 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Lanta 4.3
Based on attractiveness of visitors n=429,586

๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ Where attractive women travel to

# City Attractiveness
1 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Phi Phi 5
2 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Orlando 4.87
3 ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Zadar 4.82
4 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Gdansk 4.8
5 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Wrocล‚aw 4.79
6 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Genoa 4.77
7 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Galle 4.69
8 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Nha Trang 4.69
9 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Dresden 4.68
10 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Pha Ngan 4.6
11 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Moscow 4.6
12 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Valparaรญso 4.59
13 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Samui 4.59
14 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Rotterdam 4.58
15 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Punta Cana 4.58
16 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Kyiv 4.58
17 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Uluwatu 4.56
18 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Tel Aviv 4.56
19 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Da Lat 4.55
20 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Fuerteventura 4.55
21 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Vilnius 4.55
22 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช Budva 4.54
23 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Mykonos 4.54
24 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Cairns 4.54
25 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Rhodes 4.53
26 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Saint Petersburg 4.53
27 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Amalfi 4.53
28 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Warsaw 4.52
29 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Batumi 4.52
30 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Chicago 4.52
Based on attractiveness of visitors n=429,586


And where do unattractive people go?

๐Ÿ‘จโ€ Where unattractive men travel to

# City Attractiveness
1 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Pattaya 3.29
2 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Goa 3.41
3 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Phu Quoc 3.41
4 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Chisinau 3.5
5 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Vientiane 3.52
6 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Bengaluru 3.52
7 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Cordoba 3.55
8 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช Podgorica 3.56
9 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Batumi 3.56
10 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ต Kathmandu 3.57
11 ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡ฒ Muscat 3.59
12 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Phnom Penh 3.59
13 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Jerusalem 3.61
14 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Lviv 3.62
15 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ Asuncion 3.62
16 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Hiroshima 3.65
17 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Cairo 3.65
18 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Almaty 3.65
19 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Alicante 3.65
20 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Panama City 3.66
21 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Turin 3.67
22 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Dusseldorf 3.67
23 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Bilbao 3.67
24 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Wrocล‚aw 3.67
25 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Fukuoka 3.68
26 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Seattle 3.68
27 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Mumbai 3.69
28 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Rotterdam 3.7
29 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Kuta 3.71
30 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Nha Trang 3.72
Based on unattractiveness of visitors n=429,586

๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€๏ธ Where unattractive women travel to

# City Attractiveness
1 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Quito 3.16
2 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Wellington 3.2
3 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ช Nairobi 3.32
4 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Macau 3.34
5 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Weligama 3.37
6 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Hiroshima 3.38
7 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Cuenca 3.39
8 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Fukuoka 3.4
9 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ท San Juan 3.41
10 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Santa Marta 3.42
11 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Perth 3.44
12 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด Amman 3.5
13 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Shenzhen 3.51
14 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Santo Domingo 3.54
15 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Quebec City 3.56
16 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ Asuncion 3.56
17 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Merida 3.57
18 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Colombo 3.6
19 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Bogota 3.61
20 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Montego Bay 3.65
21 ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Lyon 3.66
22 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Vientiane 3.66
23 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Cozumel 3.67
24 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Sarajevo 3.67
25 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Queenstown 3.67
26 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Phnom Penh 3.68
27 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Panama City 3.68
28 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Glasgow 3.68
29 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท Jeju Island 3.69
30 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bansko 3.7
Based on unattractiveness of visitors n=429,586



Where do the most educated nomads travel?

Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city (locals excluded) who hold a ๐ŸŽ“ graduate degree (a Master's or PhD), based on the highest degree they selected on their profile. Adjusted for sample size so cities with few visitors don't dominate.

๐ŸŽ“ Where the most educated people travel to

# City Graduate degree
1 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Larnaca 47%
2 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Minsk 46%
3 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Boston 45%
4 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Madeira 45%
5 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg 43%
6 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Fuerteventura 43%
7 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง Beirut 43%
8 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Wrocล‚aw 43%
9 ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Brasov 43%
10 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Seattle 43%
11 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Chisinau 43%
12 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Limassol 43%
13 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Taghazout 43%
14 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Weligama 42%
15 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Andorra la Vella 42%
16 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Batumi 42%
17 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Azores 42%
18 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Tallinn 42%
19 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Montreal 42%
20 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ The Hague 42%
21 ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bishkek 42%
22 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Genoa 42%
23 ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Santo Domingo 42%
24 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Geneva 42%
25 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Thessaloniki 42%
26 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Riga 42%
27 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Yerevan 41%
28 ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ljubljana 41%
29 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Gran Canaria 41%
30 ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Sarajevo 41%
Share of visiting nomads with a graduate degree n=122,458 nomads

๐ŸšŒ Where the least educated people travel to

# City Graduate degree
1 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Cabo San Lucas 26%
2 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Phi Phi 27%
3 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Tangier 27%
4 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Tamarindo 28%
5 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Krabi 28%
6 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Guadalajara 29%
7 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Sayulita 29%
8 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ San Miguel de Allende 30%
9 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Guangzhou 30%
10 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Jakarta 31%
11 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ao Nang 31%
12 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Antigua 31%
13 ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Seminyak 31%
14 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Pattaya 31%
15 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Osaka 31%
16 ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Hiroshima 31%
17 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Hue 31%
18 ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Santa Teresa 32%
19 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Mykonos 32%
20 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Perth 32%
21 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Da Nang 32%
22 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Pai 32%
23 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ San Cristรณbal de las Casas 32%
24 ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Brisbane 32%
25 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ San Sebastian 32%
26 ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taipei 32%
27 ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Colombo 32%
28 ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Hanoi 32%
29 ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico City 32%
30 ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Utrecht 33%
Share of visiting nomads with a graduate degree n=122,458 nomads



How old are the nomads who travel to each city?

Median age of the visiting nomads who travel to each city (people who live there are excluded), based on the birth date on their profile.

๐Ÿฃ Youngest visiting nomads

#CityMedian age
1๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Almaty33 yrs
2๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Tashkent33 yrs
3๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Pisa33 yrs
4๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Ankara33 yrs
5๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Uluwatu34 yrs
6๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Warsaw34 yrs
7๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Siargao34 yrs
8๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Chengdu34 yrs
9๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Guangzhou34 yrs
10๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Batumi34 yrs
11๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Minneapolis34 yrs
12๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Antalya34 yrs
13๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Yerevan34 yrs
14๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Taghazout34 yrs
15๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Brno34 yrs
16๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Kutaisi34 yrs
17๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Milan34 yrs
18๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Doha34 yrs
19๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Bariloche34 yrs
20๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Oxford34 yrs
21๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Gothenburg34 yrs
22๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Raleigh34 yrs
23๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Asheville34 yrs
24๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Detroit34 yrs
25๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Cambridge34 yrs
26๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Phoenix34 yrs
27๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Charlotte34 yrs
28๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ป Male34 yrs
29๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฆ Vatican City34 yrs
30๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Chamonix34 yrs
Median age of visiting nomads (locals excluded)n=200,405 nomads

๐Ÿง“ Oldest visiting nomads

#CityMedian age
1๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ San Miguel de Allende41 yrs
2๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Recife40 yrs
3๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Puebla39 yrs
4๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Wellington39 yrs
5๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Hyderabad39 yrs
6๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Yangon38 yrs
7๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Hua Hin38 yrs
8๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Puerto Viejo38 yrs
9๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ St. Louis38 yrs
10๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Merida38 yrs
11๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Fortaleza38 yrs
12๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Lanta38 yrs
13๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Cuenca38 yrs
14๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Quebec City37.5 yrs
15๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Galway37.5 yrs
16๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ San Sebastian37.5 yrs
17๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Tampa37.5 yrs
18๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Puerto Vallarta37 yrs
19๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง Beirut37 yrs
20๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Sayulita37 yrs
21๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Belfast37 yrs
22๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ธ Nassau37 yrs
23๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Tarifa37 yrs
24๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Isla Mujeres37 yrs
25๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Andorra la Vella37 yrs
26๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Montpellier37 yrs
27๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Bocas del Toro37 yrs
28๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Valparaรญso37 yrs
29๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Gibraltar37 yrs
30๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Vientiane37 yrs
Median age of visiting nomads (locals excluded)n=200,405 nomads


Where do the highest-earning nomads travel?

Median self-reported yearly income of the visiting nomads who travel to each city (locals excluded). The median is used so a few very large numbers can’t skew it.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Highest-earning visitors

#CityMedian income
1๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Austin$125,000
2๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Vancouver$125,000
3๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Tokyo$100,000
4๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Cape Town$100,000
5๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ New York City$100,000
6๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Copenhagen$100,000
7๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico City$100,000
8๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Auckland$100,000
9๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ljubljana$100,000
10๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Sydney$100,000
11๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Boston$100,000
12๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taipei$100,000
13๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Delhi$100,000
14๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Montreal$100,000
15๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Marrakesh$100,000
16๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Rio de Janeiro$100,000
17๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Buenos Aires$100,000
18๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Bogota$100,000
19๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Toronto$100,000
20๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Miami$100,000
21๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Zurich$100,000
22๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Stockholm$100,000
23๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Geneva$100,000
24๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Kyoto$100,000
25๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Florianopolis$100,000
26๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Medellรญn$100,000
27๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong$100,000
28๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ San Francisco$100,000
29๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Dubai$100,000
30๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Reykjavik$100,000
Median self-reported income of visiting nomadsn=46,606 nomads

๐Ÿช™ Lowest-earning visitors

#CityMedian income
1๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Cebu$70,000
2๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Almaty$70,000
3๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Yerevan$70,000
4๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Batumi$70,000
5๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Pattaya$75,000
6๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Antalya$75,000
7๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Hoi An$75,000
8๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Pha Ngan$75,000
9๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Penang$75,000
10๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bansko$75,000
11๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Phnom Penh$75,000
12๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท Busan$75,000
13๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Tbilisi$75,000
14๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Da Nang$75,000
15๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Kuala Lumpur$75,000
16๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Skopje$77,500
17๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฆ Vatican City$80,000
18๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg$80,000
19๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Tao$80,000
20๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Colombo$80,000
21๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Tenerife$80,000
22๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Phuket$80,000
23๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Lanta$80,000
24๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Belgrade$80,000
25๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Jakarta$80,000
26๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Fukuoka$80,000
27๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Siem Reap$80,000
28๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Krabi$80,000
29๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Hanoi$80,000
30๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Istanbul$80,000
Median self-reported income of visiting nomadsn=46,606 nomads


Which cities draw the most international nomads?

Among the nomads who travel to each city, the chance that two random visitors come from different countries — higher means a more internationally mixed crowd of visitors.

๐ŸŒ Most international crowd

#CityNationality mix
1๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Denver96%
2๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ San Francisco96%
3๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ New York City96%
4๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Houston95%
5๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Washington95%
6๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Boston95%
7๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Los Angeles95%
8๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Langkawi95%
9๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Las Vegas95%
10๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Miami95%
11๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Chicago95%
12๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Weligama95%
13๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Gili Trawangan95%
14๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Galle95%
15๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Brno95%
16๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Colombo95%
17๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Tenerife94%
18๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Kutaisi94%
19๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Seattle94%
20๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Uluwatu94%
21๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Abu Dhabi94%
22๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Hua Hin94%
23๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Denpasar94%
24๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Dahab94%
25๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ San Diego94%
26๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Dubai94%
27๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Rhodes94%
28๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Varna94%
29๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ New Orleans94%
30๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Kuta94%
How mixed the visiting nomads’ nationalities aren=164,352 nomads

๐Ÿ“ Least international crowd

#CityNationality mix
1๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Cabo San Lucas41%
2๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ท San Juan47%
3๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ San Miguel de Allende47%
4๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Sayulita56%
5๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Cuenca56%
6๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Puerto Vallarta58%
7๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ธ Nassau64%
8๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Tamarindo65%
9๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Cozumel67%
10๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Guadalajara69%
11๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Santa Teresa70%
12๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Antigua71%
13๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Guatemala City72%
14๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico City72%
15๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Quito72%
16๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Merida73%
17๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Medellรญn74%
18๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Vancouver75%
19๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Oaxaca75%
20๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฎ San Juan del Sur75%
21๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Tulum76%
22๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Quebec City76%
23๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Amalfi76%
24๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Bocas del Toro76%
25๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท San Josรฉ76%
26๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Reykjavik76%
27๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ป San Salvador77%
28๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Calgary77%
29๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Playa del Carmen78%
30๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Cartagena78%
How mixed the visiting nomads’ nationalities aren=164,352 nomads


Where do software developers travel?

Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who work as software, web or mobile developers (of those who shared their profession).

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป Most developer-heavy visitors

#CityDevelopers
1๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Batumi67%
2๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Almaty67%
3๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Tashkent63%
4๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Larnaca63%
5๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bishkek63%
6๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Yerevan62%
7๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Cluj62%
8๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Minsk62%
9๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Wrocล‚aw62%
10๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Da Lat61%
11๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Kaohsiung61%
12๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Lyon61%
13๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Antalya61%
14๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Denpasar61%
15๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Pattaya60%
16๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Hiroshima60%
17๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Fukuoka60%
18๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Novi Sad60%
19๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Osaka60%
20๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Krakรณw59%
21๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ San Francisco59%
22๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Phu Quoc59%
23๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Bengaluru59%
24๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Orlando59%
25๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Tbilisi59%
26๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Belgrade59%
27๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Langkawi59%
28๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Moscow59%
29๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Antwerp59%
30๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช Budva59%
Share of visiting nomads who are developersn=152,140 nomads

๐ŸŒด Fewest developers

#CityDevelopers
1๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Cabo San Lucas36%
2๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Salvador39%
3๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Cuenca40%
4๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฎ San Juan del Sur41%
5๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Tulum41%
6๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Santa Marta42%
7๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Santo Domingo42%
8๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Sayulita42%
9๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Puerto Vallarta42%
10๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ San Miguel de Allende42%
11๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Oaxaca42%
12๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Antigua42%
13๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Merida42%
14๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Cape Town43%
15๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Santa Teresa43%
16๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ San Sebastian43%
17๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง Beirut44%
18๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Punta Cana44%
19๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Bocas del Toro44%
20๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด Amman45%
21๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ช Nairobi45%
22๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท El Calafate45%
23๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Quito45%
24๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Lake Como45%
25๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Perth45%
26๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡บ Havana45%
27๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Mykonos45%
28๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Isla Mujeres45%
29๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Essaouira46%
30๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ท San Juan46%
Share of visiting nomads who are developersn=152,140 nomads


Where do startup founders travel?

Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who are startup founders (of those who shared their profession).

๐Ÿš€ Most founder-heavy visitors

#CityFounders
1๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ San Francisco47%
2๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Marbella46%
3๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Shenzhen46%
4๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Lake Como45%
5๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Boston44%
6๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ New Orleans44%
7๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Dallas43%
8๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡ฒ Muscat42%
9๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Perth41%
10๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Las Vegas41%
11๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Kyiv41%
12๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Los Angeles41%
13๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Cannes40%
14๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong40%
15๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Dubai40%
16๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡จ Monaco40%
17๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ New York City40%
18๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Hamburg40%
19๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Abu Dhabi40%
20๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Doha39%
21๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Guangzhou39%
22๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Canggu39%
23๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Bengaluru39%
24๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Washington39%
25๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Larnaca39%
26๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ธ Nassau39%
27๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Denver39%
28๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Seattle39%
29๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Denpasar39%
30๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Goa39%
Share of visiting nomads who are foundersn=152,140 nomads

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿญ Fewest founders

#CityFounders
1๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Bariloche23%
2๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท El Calafate25%
3๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช Arequipa26%
4๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Glasgow26%
5๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Merida27%
6๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Cuenca27%
7๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Guadalajara27%
8๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Mendoza27%
9๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Sarajevo27%
10๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Puerto Viejo27%
11๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Sarandรซ27%
12๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Puerto Escondido27%
13๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ San Cristรณbal de las Casas27%
14๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Mostar27%
15๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Granada28%
16๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท Busan28%
17๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Plovdiv28%
18๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Oaxaca28%
19๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Liverpool28%
20๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Christchurch28%
21๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Quito28%
22๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Santa Teresa28%
23๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช Cusco28%
24๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Zadar28%
25๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Cordoba28%
26๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Punta Cana29%
27๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Santa Marta29%
28๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Bologna29%
29๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช Kotor29%
30๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ด La Paz29%
Share of visiting nomads who are foundersn=152,140 nomads


Where do designers travel?

Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city in UI/UX or creative design roles (of those who shared their profession).

๐ŸŽจ Most designer-heavy visitors

#CityDesigners
1๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ San Sebastian38%
2๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Perth37%
3๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Los Angeles35%
4๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Essaouira35%
5๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Portland35%
6๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Shanghai35%
7๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Melbourne35%
8๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Cannes35%
9๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Antwerp34%
10๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Bilbao34%
11๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Tangier34%
12๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Penang34%
13๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ธ Nassau34%
14๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Faro34%
15๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Tulum34%
16๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Phnom Penh34%
17๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ New Orleans33%
18๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Izmir33%
19๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ San Francisco33%
20๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Colombo33%
21๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Montpellier33%
22๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Beijing33%
23๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Langkawi33%
24๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Pha Ngan33%
25๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Berlin33%
26๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Puerto Viejo33%
27๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Siargao33%
28๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Guangzhou33%
29๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Hamburg33%
30๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Edinburgh33%
Share of visiting nomads who are designersn=152,140 nomads

๐Ÿ”ง Fewest designers

#CityDesigners
1๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ Asuncion19%
2๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Bariloche22%
3๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Denver22%
4๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Limassol23%
5๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Ushuaia23%
6๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Andorra la Vella23%
7๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Dahab23%
8๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช Podgorica23%
9๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท Jeju Island24%
10๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Zadar24%
11๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Vilnius24%
12๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท El Calafate24%
13๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Verona24%
14๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Almaty24%
15๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Rhodes24%
16๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Foz do Iguaรงu24%
17๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Minsk24%
18๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Santo Domingo24%
19๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg25%
20๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Sanur25%
21๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Baku25%
22๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Gothenburg25%
23๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Paphos25%
24๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Mendoza25%
25๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Atlanta25%
26๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Tbilisi25%
27๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Casablanca25%
28๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Yerevan25%
29๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡พ Montevideo25%
30๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Larnaca25%
Share of visiting nomads who are designersn=152,140 nomads


Which cities attract the fittest nomads?

Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who lift — gym, strength training and Crossfit (casual running, cycling and yoga are not counted).

๐Ÿ’ช Fittest visiting nomads

#CityGym / strength
1๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Ericeira56%
2๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Uluwatu52%
3๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Medellรญn52%
4๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Samui51%
5๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Playa del Carmen50%
6๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Siargao50%
7๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Santo Domingo50%
8๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Florianopolis50%
9๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Cali50%
10๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Santa Teresa50%
11๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Doha50%
12๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Krabi49%
13๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Tamarindo49%
14๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Rio de Janeiro49%
15๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Hvar49%
16๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Pha Ngan49%
17๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท Puerto Viejo49%
18๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Panama City49%
19๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Canggu49%
20๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ท San Juan49%
21๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Cartagena49%
22๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Miami48%
23๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Guadalajara48%
24๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Fuerteventura48%
25๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Sรฃo Paulo48%
26๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Dallas48%
27๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Marbella48%
28๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Abu Dhabi48%
29๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Mallorca48%
30๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Dubrovnik48%
Share of visiting nomads into gym & strength trainingn=148,754 nomads

๐Ÿ›‹๏ธ Least gym-going visitors

#CityGym / strength
1๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ The Hague31%
2๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Glasgow33%
3๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Izmir34%
4๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Yogyakarta34%
5๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Plovdiv34%
6๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ San Miguel de Allende35%
7๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Bergen35%
8๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Belfast35%
9๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Jaipur35%
10๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Tashkent35%
11๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Minsk35%
12๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Ushuaia35%
13๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Sarajevo36%
14๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Chiang Rai36%
15๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Mostar36%
16๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช Arequipa36%
17๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Novi Sad36%
18๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Almaty36%
19๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Chengdu36%
20๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ San Pedro de Atacama37%
21๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Yerevan37%
22๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Lyon37%
23๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ San Cristรณbal de las Casas37%
24๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Edinburgh37%
25๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Fes37%
26๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Cordoba37%
27๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Portland37%
28๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Dusseldorf37%
29๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Chisinau37%
30๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Liverpool38%
Share of visiting nomads into gym & strength trainingn=148,754 nomads


Where do the biggest drinkers travel?

Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who list beer, wine, cocktails or drinking among their likes (of those who shared any lifestyle likes).

๐Ÿบ Biggest drinkers

#CityDrinks
1๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Mendoza71%
2๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Hue65%
3๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡บ Havana65%
4๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡พ Montevideo65%
5๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Dublin64%
6๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Dubrovnik64%
7๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Santa Marta64%
8๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Cordoba64%
9๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Florence64%
10๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Isla Mujeres64%
11๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Boracay64%
12๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Bariloche64%
13๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Cancun64%
14๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ท San Juan64%
15๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Manchester64%
16๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Orlando63%
17๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Split63%
18๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Seville63%
19๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฆ Vatican City63%
20๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Reykjavik63%
21๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Quito63%
22๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Queenstown63%
23๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ New Orleans63%
24๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Zadar63%
25๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Sapporo63%
26๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Cologne63%
27๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Santorini63%
28๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ธ Nassau63%
29๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Lanta63%
30๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Guadalajara63%
Share of visiting nomads who like alcoholn=148,754 nomads

๐Ÿšฑ Most sober visitors

#CityDrinks
1๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Shenzhen49%
2๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ Tunis49%
3๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Utrecht49%
4๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portimรฃo49%
5๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Lake Como50%
6๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Guangzhou51%
7๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Stuttgart51%
8๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Chisinau51%
9๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Abu Dhabi52%
10๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Jakarta52%
11๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Bengaluru52%
12๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Moscow52%
13๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ป San Salvador52%
14๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡ฒ Muscat52%
15๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Minsk52%
16๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Ubud52%
17๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Sanur52%
18๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช Podgorica52%
19๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Shanghai53%
20๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Manila53%
21๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Geneva53%
22๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท Seoul53%
23๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Uluwatu53%
24๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Hua Hin53%
25๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Honolulu53%
26๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Dubai53%
27๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Timisoara53%
28๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Siargao53%
29๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Taghazout53%
30๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ต Pokhara53%
Share of visiting nomads who like alcoholn=148,754 nomads


Where do the biggest partiers travel?

Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who list partying among their likes (of those who shared any lifestyle likes).

๐ŸŽ‰ Biggest partiers

#CityParties
1๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Ibiza28%
2๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Mykonos25%
3๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Hvar25%
4๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Rio de Janeiro22%
5๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Tangier21%
6๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Guatemala City21%
7๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Split21%
8๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Santa Marta21%
9๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Goa21%
10๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Cartagena21%
11๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Phi Phi21%
12๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡บ Havana21%
13๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Pha Ngan21%
14๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Tao20%
15๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Pattaya20%
16๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Tulum20%
17๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Montreal20%
18๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Bogota20%
19๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Salvador20%
20๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Seminyak20%
21๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Playa del Carmen20%
22๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Fes20%
23๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Gili Air20%
24๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡จ Monaco20%
25๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Medellรญn20%
26๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Cabo San Lucas20%
27๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Colombo20%
28๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Marseille20%
29๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Denpasar20%
30๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Mumbai20%
Share of visiting nomads who like partyingn=148,754 nomads

๐Ÿ˜ด Quietest visitors

#CityParties
1๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Malmรถ10%
2๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Hamburg10%
3๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Sanur10%
4๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Novi Sad10%
5๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Lake Como11%
6๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Chengdu11%
7๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Verona12%
8๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Antwerp12%
9๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Minsk12%
10๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Tashkent12%
11๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bishkek12%
12๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Wrocล‚aw12%
13๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Weligama12%
14๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Dallas12%
15๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Gothenburg12%
16๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Yerevan12%
17๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Essaouira13%
18๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ San Miguel de Allende13%
19๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Bengaluru13%
20๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ Asuncion13%
21๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡ฒ Muscat13%
22๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Chiang Rai13%
23๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช Tbilisi13%
24๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Jerusalem13%
25๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Glasgow13%
26๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Salzburg13%
27๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Pisa13%
28๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Plovdiv13%
29๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ป Male13%
30๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Siargao13%
Share of visiting nomads who like partyingn=148,754 nomads


Where do single nomads travel?

Share of the visiting nomads who travel to each city who say they’re single (of those who shared their relationship status).

๐Ÿ’˜ Most single visitors

#CitySingle
1๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Medellรญn79%
2๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Cebu76%
3๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Puerto Escondido75%
4๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Quito74%
5๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Cartagena74%
6๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ช Nairobi74%
7๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Rio de Janeiro74%
8๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Antigua74%
9๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Florianopolis73%
10๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Cairo73%
11๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ท San Josรฉ73%
12๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Ibiza73%
13๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Panama City73%
14๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Buenos Aires73%
15๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Manila73%
16๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ Asuncion73%
17๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช Lima73%
18๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bansko73%
19๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Guangzhou73%
20๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด Amman72%
21๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช Cusco72%
22๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Valencia72%
23๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico City72%
24๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Canggu72%
25๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Gran Canaria72%
26๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taipei72%
27๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Sรฃo Paulo72%
28๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Zagreb72%
29๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Bogota72%
30๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Playa del Carmen71%
Share of visiting nomads who are singlen=70,235 nomads

๐Ÿ’ Most coupled-up visitors

#CitySingle
1๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Phi Phi58%
2๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฆ Vatican City59%
3๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Larnaca60%
4๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Penang60%
5๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Salzburg60%
6๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Frankfurt60%
7๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Colombo60%
8๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Seattle61%
9๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Abu Dhabi61%
10๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Ko Lanta61%
11๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Krabi61%
12๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Antalya62%
13๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Moscow62%
14๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Austin62%
15๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Bruges62%
16๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡น Sliema62%
17๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Oslo62%
18๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Saint Petersburg62%
19๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡บ Havana63%
20๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong Kong63%
21๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Vancouver63%
22๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Las Vegas63%
23๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ San Diego63%
24๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Manchester63%
25๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ San Francisco63%
26๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Paris64%
27๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Milan64%
28๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด Punta Cana64%
29๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Hamburg64%
30๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Siem Reap64%
Share of visiting nomads who are singlen=70,235 nomads


The overall mix: attractive, rich & educated

A blended 0-100 score of the visiting nomads to each city, combining how attractive they’re rated, their median income, and how many hold a graduate degree. Each city is percentile-ranked against the others on all three, then averaged with equal weight.

๐Ÿ† Most attractive, rich & educated

#CityScore
1๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Boston90%
2๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Zurich86%
3๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Cape Town82%
4๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Reykjavik77%
5๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Geneva77%
6๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Stockholm75%
7๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Florianopolis75%
8๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Tel Aviv74%
9๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Rio de Janeiro72%
10๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ New York City72%
11๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Ibiza70%
12๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Tulum70%
13๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Copenhagen69%
14๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Oslo68%
15๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Montreal68%
16๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Marrakesh67%
17๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Sรฃo Paulo66%
18๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Ljubljana66%
19๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Munich65%
20๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Palermo64%
21๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Naples63%
22๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Austin62%
23๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Mallorca62%
24๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด Cartagena62%
25๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Puerto Escondido61%
26๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Madeira61%
27๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Nice60%
28๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Riga60%
29๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Lisbon59%
30๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Sarajevo59%
Blend of attractiveness, income & education of visiting nomadsn=46,606 nomads

๐Ÿ–๏ธ Least attractive, lowest income & least educated

#CityScore
1๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Pattaya2%
2๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Da Nang6%
3๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Colombo7%
4๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Kuala Lumpur12%
5๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Cebu12%
6๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Phuket13%
7๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Ho Chi Minh City14%
8๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Manila14%
9๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Jakarta15%
10๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Seminyak18%
11๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Tirana18%
12๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Phnom Penh18%
13๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Hanoi19%
14๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Fukuoka19%
15๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Krabi22%
16๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Penang23%
17๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Bangkok24%
18๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Siem Reap24%
19๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡พ Montevideo24%
20๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Osaka24%
21๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Almaty27%
22๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Belgrade27%
23๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taipei28%
24๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Hoi An30%
25๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท Busan30%
26๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Quito30%
27๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Bratislava31%
28๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ Asuncion31%
29๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Antalya32%
30๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท Seoul32%
Blend of attractiveness, income & education of visiting nomadsn=46,606 nomads


Liked these insights?

Check out Nomads.com to find the best places to live and work remotely, and meet other people also traveling as a digital nomad.

#1 Nomad Community Since 2014

๐ŸŒ Find your people




C22ms
โ€น โ€บ
×
USD โ”€ $
ยฐC
Nomad cost
โœจ To see all results
Join Nomads.com free
by @levelsio
๐ŸŒ Join a community of digital nomads living around the world
×
61ms